Protesters March Against Escalation of War in Afghanistan, Ongoing Occupation of Iraq

On Saturday, October 17, nearly 400 people gathered in Minneapolis to protest the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  The demonstration was part of a national day of action to oppose the U.S. occupation of both countries.  Additional photos below.

Anti-war events were held in 50 cities across the U.S. in response to the recent escalation of the war in Afghanistan where troop levels have more than doubled since Obama took office.  There are currently 67,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan and 1,000 more are headed there by the end of December.  General Stanley McChrystal, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, warned that unless additional troops are deployed, “the conflict will likely result in failure.”  Obama recently told Congress that he has ruled out a U.S. withdrawal and will not consider cutting back troop levels.  Right now he's considering McChrystal’s request for up to 80,000 more U.S. troops in Afghanistan.


The proposal comes at a time when civilian and troop deaths in Afghanistan are at an all-time high.  For U.S. troops, August 2009 was the deadliest month of the 8 year old war so far, with 51 soldiers killed.  And according to the UN, August 2009 was the year’s deadliest month for Afghan civilians.  Overall, more than 1,500 civilians have been killed so far this year, an increase of nearly 400 over the same period in 2008.

Related: October 17 MPLS Antiwar March | OWO Speech From Youth Feeder March (Video) | Photos: Afghan War 8th Anniversary Peace Vigil | Indymedia.US antiwar coverage

At a rally in front of the Uptown Library, Anti-War Committee member Jess Sundin, informed the crowd that 57% of people recently surveyed by CNN said they oppose the war in Afghanistan.  “The majority of people in this country agree with us,” said Sundin.  They know it’s an unjust war that doesn’t make us safer.  And while it may be difficult to not have tens of thousands marching with us, we know that members of our communities are fighting life and death battles right here at home.  They’re losing their jobs, their homes, and their health care.”

Sundin pointed out that while the U.S. is currently in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, over $900 billion has been spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  “Every dollar spent on war takes food, shelter, and other resources away from people in this country,” said Sundin.

Last week, U.S. military officials announced that they had met all of their annual recruiting goals for the first time in 35 years.  A senior Pentagon official credited the economic crisis with boosting enlistments.  “It’s up to us in the anti-war movement to provide people with information and another solution,” said Sundin.  “Poverty should not force an economic draft.  The U.S. government’s current priorities are warped and inhumane.  There can be no justice with occupation.  People at home and abroad have the right to self-determination.”

Niger Saravia Arevalo addressed the rally on behalf of the local FMLN committee.  “We’re here to say that the Latino community is part of this effort.  We stand against the atrocities being committed by the U.S. in the Middle East, in Central Asia, and in Latin America.”  He called on Obama to withdraw support for the recent coup in Honduras and to remove U.S. military bases from Colombia.  “We need to continue growing and expanding a people’s movement to stop policies of war and repression,” said Arevalo.

After being joined by a feeder march of anti-war youth, protesters marched down Hennepin Avenue to Loring Park where Sami Rasouli, the Iraqi-American founder of the Muslim Peacemaker Team (MPT) addressed the crowd.  He said that while U.S. troop levels in Iraq have slightly decreased, living conditions are still horrendous.  In his hometown of Najaf, depleted uranium residue from U.S. weapons has led to an epidemic of breast cancer.  Normal rates of breast cancer are 7 cases per 100,000 people.  Doctors working with the MPT found that in 2007, the breast cancer rate in Najaf was 28 per 100,000.  By 2009, that number jumped to 65.  Sami also said that 170 babies born in Falluja in August 2009 showed signs of depleted uranium poisoning.  25% of them died within a week, and the rest had severe birth defects.

“There are still over 100,000 troops in Iraq,” said Sami, “And the war in Afghanistan is escalating.  We must end these wars.  This is not the change we wanted when Obama was elected.”

Kira Downey, an activist with Youth Against War and Racism called for “change from the bottom up.  We can’t elect change,” she said.  “We must create it by taking a stand in the streets and in our communities.”

Speakers from the Pakistan Trade Union Defense Campaign, Military Families Speak Out, the MN Coalition for a People’s Bailout, and the facetious “Billionaires for Wealth Care” also addressed the crowd.  A performance from Junkyard Empire closed the rally.

Demonstration organizers encouraged participants to respond to any escalation of the war in Afghanistan by returning to the streets with an anti-war message in the coming weeks.  A member of the Opposition to War and Occupation collective called for non-cooperation and direct action against the state in an earlier speech to the youth feeder march.  The text of that statement can be found here:  http://www.twincities.indymedia.org/2009/oct/owo-speech-1017-anti-war-youth-feeder-march        

Comments

Pre Approved Chants and Other Such Things

There was a group of us who were "admonished" by some of the "leadership" for our chants.

Because we dared speak an 'inconvenient truth." The simple fact of Obama's and the democrats direct complicity in these illegal, immoral wars.

In fact, we were handed a "pre-approved" set of chants. We were asked to not do our own chants.

 

I kid you not.

 

Fortunately, this whole debacle was caught on tape.

 

There will be an Indy Media report on it. Perhaps the issues of supression of dissent in the "peace and justice" movement and by some of it's leaders can be addressed. This is and has been a long time, ongoing issue.

 

Sorry if we made some nice liberals and their friends in the 'radical' anti war crowd a wee bit uncomfortable.

 

Oh wait, no I'm not.

 

It was un f***ing believable

 

Some of us have come to grips with the need for a Free Speech Movement at the strictly rehearsed and controlled anti-war rallies. We have talked of having a Free Speech corner.

Seriously.

waste of time

This is exactly why I left the "protest" scene of this nature.  It involves a nice little niche for them.  If you step outside their box you can't play.  I have found that there are much more effective ways of getting your voice heard through direct action. 

Waste Of Time

 Sister or Brother

I hear you loud and clear.

However, we who were a part of this plan to have our own Direct Action and Civil Disobedience

against the next scripted, controlled and authoritarian psuedo anti-war action.

 

It will entail, in part, the setting up of a Free Speech corner, similar to Berkley 1967, where any and all can speak.

 

Unlike what has happened here in the Twin Cities for far too many years. You will be most welcome to participate in this kind of event any old way you like.

i found it ridiculous that we

i found it ridiculous that we were allowed only one lane to march.

and the organizers were freaking out on people who stood in other lanes. i cant count how many times i was told to get back in the lane and stay there.

we shoud have made our presence known and took the whole goddamned street.

who's streets? not ours.

O.K. it's clearly time to

O.K. it's clearly time to fight on the left.  To spend our energies figuring out how to have a free speech corner!!!  No, no, no...if this is the voice inside of your head, then you need some nice meds to help get you back to the 'reality' corner.  What should be of concern is not that the 'official' organizers of the protest want to control the message, what should be of concern is that the anti-war movement has dwindled from it's early days of the Iraq invasion.   What should be of concern is that there was a time when many thousand people in this megaopolis would turn out to protest.  It helped that Bush was the puppet master at that point.  What the left needs to deal with is the Obama factor.  Many progressives peeed  themselves with excitement when the first african american became president.  Many progressives who would have been out in the street before are now trying to figure out what became of the public option in health care and why goldman sachs execs are garnering record bonuses...so figuring out how to fight eachother, to have a separate corner screaming at the 'cops' of the movement is a sure fire way to make sure that next time there will be fewer and fewer people at the march.

so better yet, call for your own damn event.  control it how you think it should be controlled, because even if you are 'anarchist' i guarantee you will have speakers, you will pick the speakers, you will have 'some kind of marshalls' you will have some kind of control, i guarantee it,  it will be more 'free' no doubt, but i think what is at the core of the resentment in this post is the fact that the most dedicated bunch of organizers over the years here in town in 'leftist' circles happen to identify as 'neo-maoists', and their allies.  the only way to deal politically with this fact is to organize your own events, make them fun and lively and focused, and better yet, effective and watch your alienation and frustration melt away...

'Anarchists'

Your are right about the Obama factor...  However your comments about the "most dedicated bunch of organizers" being 'neo-maoists' is quite inflammatory.  This isn't a goddamn activist competition!  'Anarchists' do a ton of incredible work in this city, and folks who don't identify as such need to check their ignorance and get past the mainstream media image of "violent anarchists" which was used to create the good protester/bad protester dynamic at the RNC.  We need unity, and better understanding of the St. Paul principles to build stronger, more cohesive movements that make a difference in the lives of people being oppressed-whether its by U.S. imperialism abroad, or institutionalized racism here in our community.

imagine if that many people

imagine if that many people got together and actually did something?

How about using the Points of Unity

I can't remember them all now.. but the ones used during the RNC.

1) Respecting each other's time and space. 

2) Not publically critizing other groups and their tactics. 

There was more than you at this march. 

There were elderly people, and people with kids who might have wanted to march w/o direct action happening, and also people who believe strongly in peace and positive energy.

If you turned the march into direct action w/cops flipping out,  where would their choice be?  

Is it right that you would high jack their right to participate in the march?

I would bet 3/4th of the marchers would have no problem with direct action and taking over the whole street or even both lanes, and the swat team rushing in to use their new toys.  I know many of the "organizers" and "marshals" have been involved in direct actions, been arrested and jailed so I wouldn't condemn them for their actions.  

Why don't those of you critizing the organizers, organize a march that might or might not have d/o  and I can promise you I will be there along with others.. (as long as I'm physically able to), and we can take over the streets and do direct actions until we are arrested.

Our amazing strength in this community is our solidarity, and the powers that be would love for our solidarity to fracture and split.   It is frightening to the law enforcement and I like it that way.

"pre-approved chants?"

To the first poster...what were you chanting when you were "admonished" as you put it by march organizers?  Something about Obama and the Democrats?  Please be specific because I happen to know that many of the folks who organized this demonstration are very critical of Obama and Democratic members of Congress who haven't done enough to end the wars (or have had a direct role in escalating them).  This was not a march to promote or protect Obama or the Democratic Party by any means, so I have my doubts that simply doing a chant about Obama was considered objectionable.  I'd like to hear more about that exchange...

You mentioned "pre-approved" chants.  Really?  I don't think that just because a chant sheet may have been distributed that those are the only chants people were "allowed" to do.  I never heard anyone say that.  I think the chant sheets are meant to be a resource that people can use.  Along the march route, I saw people with and without bullhorns leading chants that were and were not on the sheet that had been referenced at the opening rally.  Perhaps you had a different experience, but I never saw anyone try to enforce any "rules" about chants.  Maybe someone near you objected to the specific chant you were doing for some reason, but I don't think there was actually a pre-planned effort on the part of organizers to "control" people's words. 

As for direct action and a diversity of tactics...I'm all for it.   Why not do it?  Who's stopping you?  Really?  I agree that it can be irritiating to be told by "marshalls" to stay in one lane.  I too heard this several times and it always rubs me the wrong way.  But I have great respect for the St. Paul Principles and I think they should continue to be a point of emphasis as various organizations and individuals strive to achieve their goals.  What about respect for a diversity of tactics (whether that tactic could be considered "illegal" OR if it involves a march that stays in one lane?).  What about direct action coinciding with or complementing a permitted march?  Separation of time or space doesn't have to be that huge.  I and other members of my organization have discussed the idea of a march that ends with CD/DA or where these types of actions occur simultaneously nearby.  I agree that non-cooperation is absolutely essential if you really want to take a stand against war and occupation.  So if you agree, then DO it.  Why waste your energy criticizing the actions of fellow organizers rather than planning and carrying out an action of your own (nearby, with visibility, that could demonstrate to the rest of the rule followers why they should join you?)     

st. paul principles

Katrina, I totally agree with you about the St. Paul principles. Diversity of tactics ain't just smashy smashy, folks.

Katrina

I will be only too happy to talk to you about this. 

yes, we were told to only chant the pre approved chants.

What we were chanting was

Who Is The Terrorist?

Obama Is The Terrorist

and

Hey Hey Ho Ho

Pro War Democrats Got To Go

when we were admonished we started to chant

We Support Wars

Yes We Can

We Support Wars For Obama Man

out of pure frustration.

Like I said, the MN We Are Change Folks recorded the entire "conversation."

Let me get this straight, you

Let me get this straight, you chanted pro-war slogans?

someone else replying... but

someone else replying...

but those chants are obviously sarcastic. considered by some to be the highest form of comedy. unknown to others.

Raise your hand if you think

Raise your hand if you think it makes sense to go to an anti-war rally to yell pro-war chants against the anti-war protesters.

In general, I dislike chanting. I find them mindless,

so to make that point, I found two other people to respond to the call, "What do you want?" with "Beat Penn State." Back in the days when we protested the invasion of Vietnam, there were several anarchists who would always yell back "Beat Purdue." It seemed the biggest marches were always on football Saturdays. Well, when we yelled "Beat Penn State," no one on this march told us we couldn't yell that.

STOP MARCHING! STOP CHANTING!

Why not do something that actually makes a difference?

You could also try not doing something.

Don't pay taxes.

Actually shut down a recruiting station (i.e. destroy  it rather than wheat pasting posters on the windows).

Neutralize anybody in a u.s. military uniform (including the "paramilitary" uniforms of the "police") - by any means necessary.

It's probably time to stop taking walks in the streets, patting ourselves on the backs and going home with a sense of righteous satisfaction.  Real bullets are being shot.  Real lives are being taken.  A real response might be in order.

Go ahead...

Have you actually done any of the things you've determined are a "real response?"  Please show me the recruiting centers you've destroyed or the soldiers and police that you've "nuetralized." 

It would be great if large numbers of people (or small numbers for that matter) were taking bold actions like that, but most people in the anti-war movement just aren't there right now.  But rather than judge them from afar, some of us choose to participate in these demonstrations in an effort to visibly oppose the wars, to bring more people into the movement, and to ENGAGE with people to try and convince them that yes, more dramatic and more direct opposition IS needed to actually stop a war.  Notice the attention given to the OWO statement at the end of this article.  I would love to see what they DO to back it up and I'd love to take part.

I agree with you that marching isn't enough, but I don't agree that criticizing others for what they are doing will "make a difference," at least not a positive one.  It only makes you sound just as self-righteous as you're assuming the marchers are. 

    

"more people into the movement"

Tell me Katrina, how do you bring more people into the movement when you are turning them off?  What are your ideas for action?

my ideas

I've been involved with anti-war organizing for 4 years.  And I do my best to support local organizations that fight for immigrants and workers rights, students, low income folks, and those targeted by police brutality and state repression.  Yes I was at the anti-war march last saturday, but it's not my favorite tactic and not the only kind of tactic I support.  I've been arrested at demonstrations and done illegal actions that I've gotten away with.  I support a diversity of tactics.  I believe in strength through diverse actions that complement each other, and I try to put my energy into building solidarity and unity among activists, in an overall effort to convince more people to engage in direct action.  I participate in various kinds of actions, and I speak and write about them when I have the opportunity.  I'm one person doing the best I can.  Those are my ideas.

What are you doing "anonymous?" besides turning people off from your version of the movement with your smug judgments?  Are you doing anything to bring people in, or just criticizing everyone who doesn't fit your narrow definitions of what's acceptable or worthwhile?   I'd love to hear your ideas...  

turning who off?  bringing

turning who off?  bringing who in?  what movement?

consider this: i was brought into social change organizing by liberals.  i held signs and walked around.  i didn't know what an anarchist was.  pretty soon i realized that walking around holding signs month after month not only didn't seem to be accomplishing much on the grand scale, it also wasn't very fun (for me.  though it may be for others).

voila, a radical was born - and it wasn't because of the best outreach or coolest direct actions of anarchists.

point being, we need it all.  and, it's not katrina's responsibility to explain an entire group's organizing model in a way that will make it appeal to every activist or potential activist.

Protest

The American government is leaving these guys and gals hanging over there and something needs to be done now. Everyone should realize that we need to clean up our mess or we will end up in the same boat as before. We can't just bomb a country and then leave it, we need to make sure the people are OK. recensioni

Can't happen

U.S. troops should not stay another day in Afghanistan.  Would you want the robber who broke into your house, killed your family, and maimed you to stay and "make sure you're ok?" 

This is what occupation does to people.  U.S. troops are not cleaning up anything.  They're perpretrating a violent effort to control what happens in a sovereign country.  The people of Afghanistan have the right to self-determination and the longer U.S. troops stay, the situation for civilians will only get worse and the people angrier.  The U.S. should never have attacked Afghanistan in the first place.  Therefore it's wrong for the occupation to continue.     

Yelling pro-war chants at an

Yelling pro-war chants at an antiwar march is not "the highest form of comedy"; it is disrespectful and the sure sign of a diletantte. If you're not serious about opposing the war find a local pub and regale the drunks with your blunted sarcasms.

For those of you who think marches are just so ho-hum, may you be reminded that it is the way revolutions are made.

almost 7 seven years

So..........7 years in March.  Where's the Revolution?  Did we miss something?!  Seriously, what changes with the marches?  No one in government cares no matter how many people attend these things across the country.  Seems pointless to me.

The primary intent of marches

The primary intent of marches is to reach millions of people with our antiwar message; it is not to have a dialogue with an imperialist government. Our strength lies in numbers and with sufficient numbers we can compel this government to do what is right.

Don't tell me you actually believe no one in the government is paying attention? Have you never heard of COINTELPRO?

I don't agree and can't take

I don't agree and can't take this seriously, sorry.

Political elitists takes

Political elitists takes nothing seriously except their own impressions and class biases. But serious activists examine every strategy and tactic employed in history, in order to understand what will most effectively move the movement forward to end the war. Anarchy never did cut it because it is based on elitism and has no respect for the majority of humanity who are effected by war--and poverty, and injustice.

Anarchism is the most

Anarchism is the most anti-elitist ideology, because it's rooted in self-organization, self-activity, and self-liberation by oppressed people.  It's the only philosophy that recognizes that no one ever got freedom by sitting back and waiting for others to hand it to them.  If any so-called anarchist is an elitist, they're not an anarchist, they're probably a douchebag hipster.

 

The story of COINTELPRO's

The story of COINTELPRO's revelation is a great example of how illegal, anonymous, clandestine, insurrectionary actions can embarass the government.

It doesn't matter how many people are in a march if the marchers are just the same vacationing retirees every weekend.  That's not a revolution, it's a token opposition.  Marches a hundred years ago were actually going somewhere- they marched to war, not to the free speech cage.

"Vacationing retirees"? Are

"Vacationing retirees"? Are you simply ignorant that the gray-haired activists who march are veterans of the antiwar movement who you have so much to learn from? They have organized, built and sustained antiwar sentiment in this country for now going on over 40 years. Do you have an ageism problem? Or are you simply ignorant of political history? These gray-haired activists who you so disdain have remained steadfast through several wars now because they believe in the good will of the American people if they know the truth and they have dedicated their lives to getting the truth out.

No one wants more than these gray-hairs that the young will respond massively but until they do we spend our retirements-and yes even out vacations-organizing antiwar events.

As for your understanding of COINTELPRO? Do your homework bucko!

Too many people seem to think

Too many people seem to think that marching around is a strategy for ending a war or getting some other demand.  That can be a supporting tactic, but it will never be successful as the primary activity of an anti-war movement, as the last 7 years have clearly shown.  Sign-waving will never be as powerful as the combined propaganda of the corporate media.

COINTELPRO was revealed when related documents were made public by a raid on an FBI office.  No one knows who carried it out.

 i think that the issue is

 i think that the issue is not marching as a good or bad tactic in and of itself, but that whatever anti-war activists take part in, it needs to be focused on producing a material problem or challenge to the ability of the US to continue to make war. if protest does not strive to impede war making, then it is not truly anti-war action, and poses activism as the passive offering of one among many legitimate opinions. for me, marches that are lined by cops and are focused on consciousness raising or free expression are inadequate and frustrating because they do not pose any problem to the continuation of war. marches that clog up transportation infrastructure/take over highways, etcetera on the other hand DO offer some public and urgent challenge to the notion that people will settle with symbolic protest while others are slaughtered. if people want to march, then then they should be willing to actually march to stop the war. 

very well put

thanks for striking a balance to this discussion.  I totally agree that people should be willing to march to stop the war.  We need to do something, we have to get this thing ended.  One wonders what people are willing to do to get it ended.  That would be a good discussion.......  any ideas?

 i think what DASWO is

 i think what DASWO is organizing is a good start: http://www.twincities.indymedia.org/2009/nov/emergency-unpermitted-march...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <span> <div> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <img> <map> <area> <hr> <br> <br /> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <tr> <td> <em> <b> <u> <i> <strong> <font> <del> <ins> <sub> <sup> <quote> <blockquote> <pre> <address> <code> <cite> <embed> <object> <param> <strike> <caption>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
* three = fifteen
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".